Alexander Bublik vs Dino Prizmic Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Alexander Bublik and Dino Prizmic have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Alexander Bublik: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Alexander Bublik holds a 34-16 record (68.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 322 times, winning 163 (50.6%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Alexander Bublik has posted a 45-21 record (68.2% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Alexander Bublik holds a record of 115-113 (50.4%) on hard, 40-40 (50.0%) on clay, and 38-20 (65.5%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 25-11 (69.4%) on hard, 14-7 (66.7%) on clay, and 5-1 (83.3%) on grass at ATP level. Alexander Bublik has won nine ATP tour-level titles (five on hard, two on clay, and two on grass). He has also won 11 titles at Challenger/ITF level (nine on hard and two on clay). Alexander Bublik serves an average of 11.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 11.1.

Dino Prizmic: Against top 10 players in the last 52 weeks, Dino Prizmic holds a 2-1 record (66.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 10 4 times, winning 2 (50.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Dino Prizmic has posted a 51-20 record (71.8% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Dino Prizmic holds a record of 12-10 (54.5%) on clay and 3-7 (30.0%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 55-22 (71.4%) on hard and 55-26 (67.9%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 10-7 (58.8%) on clay and 2-4 (33.3%) on hard at ATP level. 17-3 (85.0%) on clay and 4-1 (80.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Dino Prizmic has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard and four on clay). Dino Prizmic serves an average of 4.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 3.7.