Alexandra Eala vs Noma Noha Akugue Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Alexandra Eala and Noma Noha Akugue have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Alexandra Eala: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Alexandra Eala holds a 21-3 record (87.5%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 270 times, winning 182 (67.4%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Alexandra Eala has posted a 45-28 record (61.6% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Alexandra Eala holds a record of 20-25 (44.4%) on hard, 8-6 (57.1%) on grass, and 7-12 (36.8%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 140-62 (69.3%) on hard, 9-3 (75.0%) on grass, and 8-12 (40.0%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 16-13 (55.2%) on hard, 8-5 (61.5%) on grass, and 4-6 (40.0%) on clay at WTA level. 12-3 (80.0%) on hard and 5-0 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Alexandra Eala has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on hard and one on grass). Alexandra Eala serves an average of 1.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.2.

Noma Noha Akugue: Throughout her career, she has competed against top 50 3 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Noma Noha Akugue has posted a 63-32 record (66.3% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Noma Noha Akugue holds a record of 5-5 (50.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 118-69 (63.1%) on clay and 53-38 (58.2%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 0-2 on clay at WTA level. 29-11 (72.5%) on hard and 28-15 (65.1%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Noma Noha Akugue has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on clay and two on hard). Noma Noha Akugue serves an average of 2.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.8.