Alina Charaeva vs Camila Osorio Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Alina Charaeva and Camila Osorio have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Alina Charaeva: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Alina Charaeva holds a 6-8 record (42.9%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 19 times, winning 8 (42.1%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Alina Charaeva has posted a 40-29 record (58.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Alina Charaeva holds a record of 0-2 on hard and 0-2 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 98-59 (62.4%) on hard, 77-45 (63.1%) on clay, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-2 on hard and 0-2 on clay at WTA level. 17-8 (68.0%) on clay, 11-7 (61.1%) on hard, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Alina Charaeva has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard and four on clay). Alina Charaeva serves an average of 2.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.5.

Camila Osorio: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Camila Osorio holds a 12-4 record (75.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 231 times, winning 166 (71.9%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Camila Osorio has posted a 30-26 record (53.6% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Camila Osorio holds a record of 50-24 (67.6%) on clay, 45-52 (46.4%) on hard, and 4-13 (23.5%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 12-14 (46.2%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass at WTA level. Camila Osorio has won three WTA tour-level titles all on clay. She has also won four titles at Challenger/ITF level (three on clay and one on hard). Camila Osorio is currently serving 1.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), up from a career average of 1.3.