Amanda Anisimova vs Diane Parry Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Amanda Anisimova and Diane Parry have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Amanda Anisimova: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Amanda Anisimova holds a 7-1 record (87.5%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 103 times, winning 81 (78.6%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 8-2 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Amanda Anisimova has posted a 47-18 record (72.3% win rate). Her last match was 8 weeks ago. Over her career at WTA level, Amanda Anisimova holds a record of 94-57 (62.3%) on hard, 39-25 (60.9%) on clay, and 23-10 (69.7%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 27-10 (73.0%) on hard, 12-3 (80.0%) on grass, and 6-4 (60.0%) on clay at WTA level. Amanda Anisimova has won four WTA tour-level titles (three on hard and one on clay). Amanda Anisimova is currently serving 3.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (65 matches), up from a career average of 2.4.

Diane Parry: Throughout her career, she has competed against top 10 8 times, winning 1 (12.5%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Diane Parry has posted a 20-23 record (46.5% win rate). Her last match was 2 months ago. Over her career at WTA level, Diane Parry holds a record of 27-31 (46.6%) on hard, 17-21 (44.7%) on clay, and 8-6 (57.1%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 111-64 (63.4%) on clay, 15-20 (42.9%) on hard, and 5-2 (71.4%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 3-4 (42.9%) on hard, 3-5 (37.5%) on clay, and 2-1 (66.7%) on grass at WTA level. 2-4 (33.3%) on clay, 2-1 (66.7%) on grass, and 1-3 (25.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Diane Parry has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Diane Parry serves an average of 2.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 3.1.