Angela Fita Boluda vs Camila Osorio Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Angela Fita Boluda and Camila Osorio have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Angela Fita Boluda: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Angela Fita Boluda holds a 0-3 record (0.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 7 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Angela Fita Boluda has lost her last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Angela Fita Boluda has posted a 47-33 record (58.8% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Angela Fita Boluda holds a record of 0-2 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 250-153 (62.0%) on clay and 35-34 (50.7%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on clay at WTA level. 43-25 (63.2%) on clay and 4-6 (40.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Angela Fita Boluda has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Angela Fita Boluda serves an average of 1.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.7.

Camila Osorio: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Camila Osorio holds a 12-4 record (75.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 231 times, winning 166 (71.9%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Camila Osorio has posted a 30-26 record (53.6% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Camila Osorio holds a record of 50-24 (67.6%) on clay, 45-52 (46.4%) on hard, and 4-13 (23.5%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 12-14 (46.2%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass at WTA level. Camila Osorio has won three WTA tour-level titles all on clay. She has also won four titles at Challenger/ITF level (three on clay and one on hard). Camila Osorio is currently serving 1.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), up from a career average of 1.3.