Arthur Cazaux vs Daniil Glinka Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Arthur Cazaux and Daniil Glinka have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Arthur Cazaux: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Arthur Cazaux holds a 19-5 record (79.2%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 257 times, winning 172 (66.9%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Arthur Cazaux has posted a 30-15 record (66.7% win rate). His last match was 3 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Arthur Cazaux holds a record of 18-23 (43.9%) on hard, 8-9 (47.1%) on clay, and 2-3 (40.0%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 103-37 (73.6%) on hard, 36-27 (57.1%) on clay, and 9-3 (75.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 7-2 (77.8%) on clay, 6-8 (42.9%) on hard, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at ATP level. 7-1 (87.5%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Arthur Cazaux has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Arthur Cazaux is currently serving 8.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (45 matches), up from a career average of 7.8.

Daniil Glinka: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Daniil Glinka holds a 1-4 record (20.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 5 times, winning 1 (20.0%). Daniil Glinka has lost his last 4 matches. Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 3-7 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Daniil Glinka has posted a 52-30 record (63.4% win rate). At Challenger/ITF level: 162-139 (53.8%) on hard, 11-18 (37.9%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 43-18 (70.5%) on hard, 7-6 (53.8%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Daniil Glinka has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Daniil Glinka serves an average of 6.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 6.3.