Arthur Gea vs Jenson Brooksby Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Arthur Gea and Jenson Brooksby have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Arthur Gea: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Arthur Gea holds a 4-4 record (50.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 10 times, winning 4 (40.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Arthur Gea has posted a 48-23 record (67.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Arthur Gea holds a record of 3-3 (50.0%) on hard and 0-2 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 72-28 (72.0%) on hard, 62-55 (53.0%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 3-2 (60.0%) on hard and 0-2 on clay at ATP level. 25-7 (78.1%) on hard, 13-8 (61.9%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Arthur Gea has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Arthur Gea is currently serving 4.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (71 matches), up from a career average of 3.4.

Jenson Brooksby: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jenson Brooksby holds a 4-4 record (50.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 152 times, winning 100 (65.8%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 1-9 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jenson Brooksby has posted a 18-25 record (41.9% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Jenson Brooksby holds a record of 50-41 (54.9%) on hard, 13-10 (56.5%) on grass, and 8-11 (42.1%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 12-14 (46.2%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on grass, and 0-5 on clay at ATP level. Jenson Brooksby has won one ATP tour-level title on clay. He has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on hard and one on clay). Jenson Brooksby is currently serving 3.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (43 matches), up from a career average of 2.7.