Astra Sharma vs Laura Siegemund Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Astra Sharma and Laura Siegemund have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Astra Sharma: Throughout her career, she has competed against top 50 21 times, winning 3 (14.3%). Astra Sharma has lost her last 6 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 1-9 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Astra Sharma has posted a 27-24 record (52.9% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Astra Sharma holds a record of 23-19 (54.8%) on clay, 6-22 (21.4%) on hard, and 1-4 (20.0%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 84-47 (64.1%) on hard and 69-41 (62.7%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 1-2 (33.3%) on clay at WTA level. 15-8 (65.2%) on clay and 6-2 (75.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Astra Sharma has won one WTA tour-level title on clay. She has also won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on hard and four on clay). Astra Sharma serves an average of 2.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 3.1.

Laura Siegemund: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Laura Siegemund holds a 8-9 record (47.1%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 658 times, winning 422 (64.1%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Laura Siegemund has posted a 21-20 record (51.2% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Laura Siegemund holds a record of 64-51 (55.7%) on clay, 60-78 (43.5%) on hard, and 9-12 (42.9%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 8-8 (50.0%) on hard, 4-3 (57.1%) on grass, and 1-3 (25.0%) on clay at WTA level. Laura Siegemund has won two WTA tour-level titles both on clay. She has also won 14 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Laura Siegemund serves an average of 0.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 0.9.