Borna Gojo vs Brandon Nakashima Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Borna Gojo and Brandon Nakashima have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Borna Gojo: Throughout his career, he has competed against top 50 23 times, winning 9 (39.1%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 8-2 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Borna Gojo has posted a 28-12 record (70.0% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Borna Gojo holds a record of 10-13 (43.5%) on hard, 1-6 (14.3%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 154-86 (64.2%) on hard, 39-39 (50.0%) on clay, and 7-6 (53.8%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 25-8 (75.8%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Borna Gojo has won four titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Borna Gojo is currently serving 11.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (40 matches), up from a career average of 9.1.

Brandon Nakashima: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Brandon Nakashima holds a 21-5 record (80.8%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 226 times, winning 165 (73.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 9-1 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Brandon Nakashima has posted a 45-25 record (64.3% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Brandon Nakashima holds a record of 92-80 (53.5%) on hard, 22-15 (59.5%) on grass, and 21-24 (46.7%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 100-31 (76.3%) on hard, 13-10 (56.5%) on clay, and 6-4 (60.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 21-18 (53.8%) on hard, 5-5 (50.0%) on clay, and 5-1 (83.3%) on grass at ATP level. 14-1 (93.3%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Brandon Nakashima has won one ATP tour-level title on hard. He has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Brandon Nakashima is currently serving 9.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (70 matches), up from a career average of 7.3.