Borna Gojo vs Clement Chidekh Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Borna Gojo and Clement Chidekh have met 1 time in professional competition, with Borna Gojo leading 1-0. Their most recent encounter was in October 2025 at Roanne Challenger, where Borna Gojo prevailed on hard court 6-0 4-6 7-5.

Borna Gojo: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Borna Gojo holds a 28-12 record (70.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 401 times, winning 249 (62.1%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Borna Gojo has posted a 28-13 record (68.3% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Borna Gojo holds a record of 10-13 (43.5%) on hard, 1-6 (14.3%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 154-86 (64.2%) on hard, 39-39 (50.0%) on clay, and 7-6 (53.8%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 25-8 (75.8%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Borna Gojo has won four titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Borna Gojo is currently serving 11.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (41 matches), up from a career average of 9.1.

Clement Chidekh: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Clement Chidekh holds a 43-29 record (59.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 298 times, winning 194 (65.1%). Clement Chidekh has lost his last 4 matches. Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 3-7 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Clement Chidekh has posted a 44-30 record (59.5% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Clement Chidekh holds a record of 0-2 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 177-84 (67.8%) on hard, 8-8 (50.0%) on clay, and 3-5 (37.5%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 40-21 (65.6%) on hard, 2-3 (40.0%) on grass, and 1-2 (33.3%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Clement Chidekh has won 13 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Clement Chidekh serves an average of 2.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.7.