Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Vilius Gaubas Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Botic Van De Zandschulp and Vilius Gaubas have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Botic Van De Zandschulp: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Botic Van De Zandschulp holds a 14-7 record (66.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 398 times, winning 268 (67.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Botic Van De Zandschulp has posted a 30-31 record (49.2% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Botic Van De Zandschulp holds a record of 64-67 (48.9%) on hard, 25-26 (49.0%) on clay, and 10-11 (47.6%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 11-13 (45.8%) on hard, 5-6 (45.5%) on clay, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at ATP level. Botic Van De Zandschulp has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (three on hard and two on clay). Botic Van De Zandschulp serves an average of 5.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 5.7.

Vilius Gaubas: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Vilius Gaubas holds a 2-3 record (40.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 8 times, winning 2 (25.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Vilius Gaubas has posted a 41-28 record (59.4% win rate). His last match was 8 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Vilius Gaubas holds a record of 2-1 (66.7%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 127-76 (62.6%) on clay and 10-19 (34.5%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 2-1 (66.7%) on clay at ATP level. 28-15 (65.1%) on clay and 3-4 (42.9%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Vilius Gaubas has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Vilius Gaubas serves an average of 2.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.6.