Cameron Norrie vs Daniel Merida Aguilar Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Cameron Norrie and Daniel Merida Aguilar have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Cameron Norrie: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Cameron Norrie holds a 22-23 record (48.9%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 366 times, winning 193 (52.7%). Cameron Norrie has lost his last 4 matches. Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Cameron Norrie has posted a 32-27 record (54.2% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Cameron Norrie holds a record of 148-112 (56.9%) on hard, 72-48 (60.0%) on clay, and 26-22 (54.2%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 20-17 (54.1%) on hard, 5-7 (41.7%) on clay, and 4-3 (57.1%) on grass at ATP level. Cameron Norrie has won five ATP tour-level titles (three on hard and two on clay). Cameron Norrie is currently serving 5.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (59 matches), up from a career average of 4.7.

Daniel Merida Aguilar: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Daniel Merida Aguilar holds a 3-2 record (60.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 50 6 times, winning 3 (50.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Daniel Merida Aguilar has posted a 55-29 record (65.5% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Daniel Merida Aguilar holds a record of 6-4 (60.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 123-82 (60.0%) on clay and 59-43 (57.8%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 6-4 (60.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 20-13 (60.6%) on clay and 16-6 (72.7%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Daniel Merida Aguilar has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard and four on clay). Daniel Merida Aguilar serves an average of 2.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.1.