Camila Osorio vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Camila Osorio and Elena Gabriela Ruse have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Camila Osorio: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Camila Osorio holds a 14-17 record (45.2%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 142 times, winning 64 (45.1%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Camila Osorio has posted a 22-22 record (50.0% win rate). Her last match was 6 weeks ago. Over her career at WTA level, Camila Osorio holds a record of 44-20 (68.8%) on clay, 39-45 (46.4%) on hard, and 4-13 (23.5%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 11-12 (47.8%) on hard, 9-4 (69.2%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass at WTA level. Camila Osorio has won three WTA tour-level titles all on clay. She has also won three titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Camila Osorio is currently serving 2.0 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (44 matches), up from a career average of 1.3.

Elena Gabriela Ruse: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Elena Gabriela Ruse holds a 7-17 record (29.2%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 110 times, winning 39 (35.5%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 2-8 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Elena Gabriela Ruse has posted a 25-18 record (58.1% win rate). Her last match was 2 months ago. Over her career at WTA level, Elena Gabriela Ruse holds a record of 21-34 (38.2%) on hard, 20-22 (47.6%) on clay, and 7-10 (41.2%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 5-4 (55.6%) on clay, 4-9 (30.8%) on hard, and 4-2 (66.7%) on grass at WTA level. Elena Gabriela Ruse has won one WTA tour-level title on clay. She has also won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Elena Gabriela Ruse is currently serving 3.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (43 matches), up from a career average of 2.6.