Carole Monnet vs Celine Naef Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Carole Monnet and Celine Naef have met 1 time in professional competition, with Celine Naef leading 1-0. Their most recent encounter was in October 2024 at W50 Nantes, where Celine Naef prevailed on hard court 6-2 6-0.

Carole Monnet: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Carole Monnet holds a 29-30 record (49.2%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 484 times, winning 270 (55.8%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Carole Monnet has posted a 30-33 record (47.6% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Carole Monnet holds a record of 1-6 (14.3%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 128-112 (53.3%) on clay, 118-81 (59.3%) on hard, and 5-3 (62.5%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on clay at WTA level. 26-19 (57.8%) on clay and 3-7 (30.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Carole Monnet has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (seven on hard and one on clay). Carole Monnet serves an average of 1.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.3.

Celine Naef: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Celine Naef holds a 33-16 record (67.3%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 217 times, winning 149 (68.7%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Celine Naef has posted a 34-20 record (63.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Celine Naef holds a record of 3-3 (50.0%) on grass, 0-2 on hard, and 0-1 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 104-35 (74.8%) on hard, 27-23 (54.0%) on clay, and 13-7 (65.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 22-10 (68.8%) on hard, 8-3 (72.7%) on grass, and 2-5 (28.6%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Celine Naef has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Celine Naef serves an average of 3.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 3.2.