Casper Ruud vs Jesper De Jong Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Casper Ruud and Jesper De Jong have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Casper Ruud: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Casper Ruud holds a 30-14 record (68.2%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 369 times, winning 230 (62.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Casper Ruud has posted a 37-16 record (69.8% win rate). His last match was 2 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Casper Ruud holds a record of 153-56 (73.2%) on clay, 111-82 (57.5%) on hard, and 5-7 (41.7%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 21-11 (65.6%) on hard and 14-5 (73.7%) on clay at ATP level. Casper Ruud has won 14 ATP tour-level titles (12 on clay and two on hard). Casper Ruud is currently serving 5.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (53 matches), up from a career average of 4.9.

Jesper De Jong: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Jesper De Jong holds a 1-4 record (20.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 8 times, winning 1 (12.5%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jesper De Jong has posted a 35-31 record (53.0% win rate). His last match was 2 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Jesper De Jong holds a record of 11-9 (55.0%) on clay, 6-8 (42.9%) on hard, and 1-4 (20.0%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 135-76 (64.0%) on clay, 79-47 (62.7%) on hard, and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 10-6 (62.5%) on clay, 5-4 (55.6%) on hard, and 1-3 (25.0%) on grass at ATP level. 7-5 (58.3%) on clay and 2-4 (33.3%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Jesper De Jong has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on clay and three on hard). Jesper De Jong is currently serving 7.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (66 matches), up from a career average of 4.9.