Caty Mcnally vs Julia Riera Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Caty Mcnally and Julia Riera have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Caty Mcnally: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Caty Mcnally holds a 21-7 record (75.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 215 times, winning 140 (65.1%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Caty Mcnally has posted a 40-25 record (61.5% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Caty Mcnally holds a record of 31-41 (43.1%) on hard, 13-12 (52.0%) on grass, and 12-13 (48.0%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 54-26 (67.5%) on hard, 31-18 (63.3%) on clay, and 10-1 (90.9%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 12-13 (48.0%) on hard, 6-5 (54.5%) on clay, and 6-4 (60.0%) on grass at WTA level. 6-1 (85.7%) on hard and 5-0 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Caty Mcnally has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard, one on clay, and one on grass). Caty Mcnally serves an average of 1.6 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.8.

Julia Riera: Throughout her career, she has competed against top 50 7 times, winning 1 (14.3%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Julia Riera has posted a 37-28 record (56.9% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Julia Riera holds a record of 10-8 (55.6%) on clay, 3-4 (42.9%) on hard, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 169-99 (63.1%) on clay and 33-24 (57.9%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 2-1 (66.7%) on clay and 1-1 (50.0%) on hard at WTA level. 24-20 (54.5%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Julia Riera has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Julia Riera serves an average of 2.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.3.