Celine Naef vs Lola Radivojevic Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Celine Naef and Lola Radivojevic have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Celine Naef: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Celine Naef holds a 33-16 record (67.3%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 217 times, winning 149 (68.7%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Celine Naef has posted a 34-20 record (63.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Celine Naef holds a record of 3-3 (50.0%) on grass, 0-2 on hard, and 0-1 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 104-35 (74.8%) on hard, 27-23 (54.0%) on clay, and 13-7 (65.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 22-10 (68.8%) on hard, 8-3 (72.7%) on grass, and 2-5 (28.6%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Celine Naef has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Celine Naef serves an average of 3.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 3.2.

Lola Radivojevic: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Lola Radivojevic holds a 39-27 record (59.1%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 285 times, winning 175 (61.4%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Lola Radivojevic has posted a 41-30 record (57.7% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Lola Radivojevic holds a record of 0-1 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 110-60 (64.7%) on clay and 52-32 (61.9%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 20-15 (57.1%) on clay and 14-7 (66.7%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Lola Radivojevic has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on clay and two on hard). Lola Radivojevic serves an average of 3.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 3.6.