Chris Rodesch vs Emilio Nava Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Chris Rodesch and Emilio Nava have met 2 times in professional competition, with the series tied at 1-1. Their most recent encounter was in April 2025 at Tallahassee Challenger, where Chris Rodesch prevailed on clay court 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Chris Rodesch: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Chris Rodesch holds a 2-2 record (50.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 6 times, winning 3 (50.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Chris Rodesch has posted a 31-20 record (60.8% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Chris Rodesch holds a record of 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 69-27 (71.9%) on hard, 52-20 (72.2%) on clay, and 1-4 (20.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on grass at ATP level. 22-8 (73.3%) on hard, 2-3 (40.0%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Chris Rodesch has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on hard and four on clay). Chris Rodesch is currently serving 7.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (51 matches), up from a career average of 6.4.

Emilio Nava: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Emilio Nava holds a 34-13 record (72.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 370 times, winning 232 (62.7%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Emilio Nava has posted a 45-31 record (59.2% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Emilio Nava holds a record of 9-22 (29.0%) on hard, 5-9 (35.7%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 113-50 (69.3%) on clay, 85-69 (55.2%) on hard, and 3-4 (42.9%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 6-9 (40.0%) on hard and 4-7 (36.4%) on clay at ATP level. 21-9 (70.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Emilio Nava has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Emilio Nava is currently serving 7.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (76 matches), up from a career average of 6.7.