Chris Rodesch vs Gustavo Heide Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Chris Rodesch and Gustavo Heide have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Chris Rodesch: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Chris Rodesch holds a 29-19 record (60.4%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 192 times, winning 131 (68.2%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 3-7 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Chris Rodesch has posted a 31-21 record (59.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Chris Rodesch holds a record of 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 69-27 (71.9%) on hard, 52-20 (72.2%) on clay, and 1-4 (20.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on grass at ATP level. 22-8 (73.3%) on hard, 2-3 (40.0%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Chris Rodesch has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on hard and four on clay). Chris Rodesch is currently serving 7.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (52 matches), up from a career average of 6.4.

Gustavo Heide: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Gustavo Heide holds a 45-17 record (72.6%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 268 times, winning 175 (65.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Gustavo Heide has posted a 47-19 record (71.2% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Gustavo Heide holds a record of 3-7 (30.0%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 143-70 (67.1%) on clay and 22-14 (61.1%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 39-11 (78.0%) on clay and 4-2 (66.7%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Gustavo Heide has won 11 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Gustavo Heide serves an average of 4.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 4.6.