Coleman Wong vs Jakub Mensik Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Coleman Wong and Jakub Mensik have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Coleman Wong: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Coleman Wong holds a 1-2 record (33.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 3 times, winning 1 (33.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Coleman Wong has posted a 38-29 record (56.7% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Coleman Wong holds a record of 8-10 (44.4%) on hard, 0-1 on clay, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 104-72 (59.1%) on hard, 9-18 (33.3%) on clay, and 5-5 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 7-5 (58.3%) on hard and 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 13-10 (56.5%) on hard, 5-3 (62.5%) on grass, and 2-3 (40.0%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Coleman Wong has won two titles at Challenger/ITF level (both on hard). Coleman Wong is currently serving 8.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (67 matches), up from a career average of 7.6.

Jakub Mensik: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jakub Mensik holds a 8-4 record (66.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 134 times, winning 91 (67.9%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jakub Mensik has posted a 32-21 record (60.4% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Jakub Mensik holds a record of 38-22 (63.3%) on hard, 11-7 (61.1%) on clay, and 6-7 (46.2%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 17-11 (60.7%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on clay, and 4-3 (57.1%) on grass at ATP level. Jakub Mensik has won one ATP tour-level title on hard. He has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard and two on clay). Jakub Mensik is currently serving 13.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (53 matches), up from a career average of 9.6.