Daniel Merida Aguilar vs Learner Tien Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Daniel Merida Aguilar and Learner Tien have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Daniel Merida Aguilar: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Daniel Merida Aguilar holds a 0-1 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 1 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Daniel Merida Aguilar has posted a 49-28 record (63.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Daniel Merida Aguilar holds a record of 6-4 (60.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 125-83 (60.1%) on clay and 59-43 (57.8%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 6-4 (60.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 16-6 (72.7%) on hard and 14-11 (56.0%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Daniel Merida Aguilar has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard and four on clay). Daniel Merida Aguilar is currently serving 2.6 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (77 matches), up from a career average of 2.1.

Learner Tien: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Learner Tien holds a 32-20 record (61.5%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 84 times, winning 47 (56.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Learner Tien has posted a 48-22 record (68.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Learner Tien holds a record of 40-24 (62.5%) on hard, 10-10 (50.0%) on clay, and 5-4 (55.6%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 31-14 (68.9%) on hard, 9-4 (69.2%) on clay, and 4-3 (57.1%) on grass at ATP level. Learner Tien has won two ATP tour-level titles (one on hard and one on clay). He has also won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Learner Tien is currently serving 5.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (70 matches), up from a career average of 4.3.