Daria Snigur vs Maria Sakkari Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Daria Snigur and Maria Sakkari have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Daria Snigur: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Daria Snigur holds a 2-3 record (40.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 27 times, winning 12 (44.4%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Daria Snigur has posted a 42-25 record (62.7% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Daria Snigur holds a record of 3-7 (30.0%) on hard and 3-4 (42.9%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 174-77 (69.3%) on hard, 12-9 (57.1%) on clay, and 12-8 (60.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-2 on hard at WTA level. 31-15 (67.4%) on hard and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Daria Snigur has won 11 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Daria Snigur serves an average of 1.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 0.8.

Maria Sakkari: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Maria Sakkari holds a 6-2 record (75.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 412 times, winning 269 (65.3%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Maria Sakkari has posted a 26-27 record (49.1% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Maria Sakkari holds a record of 160-128 (55.6%) on hard, 61-43 (58.7%) on clay, and 27-24 (52.9%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 14-18 (43.8%) on hard, 5-5 (50.0%) on clay, and 3-3 (50.0%) on grass at WTA level. Maria Sakkari has won two WTA tour-level titles (one on hard and one on clay). She has also won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on clay and three on hard). Maria Sakkari serves an average of 2.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 3.3.