Denis Shapovalov vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Denis Shapovalov and Pablo Llamas Ruiz have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Denis Shapovalov: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Denis Shapovalov holds a 8-4 record (66.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 188 times, winning 133 (70.7%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 3-7 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Denis Shapovalov has posted a 20-22 record (47.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Denis Shapovalov holds a record of 169-124 (57.7%) on hard, 37-42 (46.8%) on clay, and 21-25 (45.7%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 17-14 (54.8%) on hard, 2-5 (28.6%) on clay, and 1-3 (25.0%) on grass at ATP level. Denis Shapovalov has won five ATP tour-level titles all on hard. Denis Shapovalov serves an average of 7.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 8.1.

Pablo Llamas Ruiz: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Pablo Llamas Ruiz holds a 2-1 record (66.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 50 7 times, winning 2 (28.6%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Pablo Llamas Ruiz has posted a 48-23 record (67.6% win rate). His last match was 2 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Pablo Llamas Ruiz holds a record of 7-7 (50.0%) on clay and 1-2 (33.3%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 133-69 (65.8%) on clay and 27-28 (49.1%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 4-3 (57.1%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 24-9 (72.7%) on clay and 7-6 (53.8%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Pablo Llamas Ruiz has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on clay and one on hard). Pablo Llamas Ruiz serves an average of 2.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.3.