Eliot Spizzirri vs Lorenzo Musetti Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Eliot Spizzirri and Lorenzo Musetti have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Eliot Spizzirri: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Eliot Spizzirri holds a 0-2 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 2 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Eliot Spizzirri has posted a 34-15 record (69.4% win rate). His last match was 8 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Eliot Spizzirri holds a record of 10-8 (55.6%) on hard, 1-2 (33.3%) on grass, and 0-1 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 81-38 (68.1%) on hard, 8-7 (53.3%) on clay, and 4-4 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 9-6 (60.0%) on hard and 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 17-4 (81.0%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Eliot Spizzirri has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Eliot Spizzirri is currently serving 6.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (49 matches), up from a career average of 4.8.

Lorenzo Musetti: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Lorenzo Musetti holds a 7-1 record (87.5%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 181 times, winning 122 (67.4%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Lorenzo Musetti has posted a 33-20 record (62.3% win rate). His last match was 2 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Lorenzo Musetti holds a record of 85-75 (53.1%) on hard, 78-43 (64.5%) on clay, and 18-11 (62.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 27-16 (62.8%) on hard and 6-4 (60.0%) on clay at ATP level. Lorenzo Musetti has won two ATP tour-level titles (one on hard and one on clay). Lorenzo Musetti is currently serving 5.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (53 matches), up from a career average of 3.6.