Elmer Moller vs Liam Draxl Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Elmer Moller and Liam Draxl have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Elmer Moller: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Elmer Moller holds a 28-21 record (57.1%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 246 times, winning 156 (63.4%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Elmer Moller has posted a 34-26 record (56.7% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Elmer Moller holds a record of 0-1 on hard, 0-4 on clay, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 117-49 (70.5%) on clay and 37-34 (52.1%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on hard, 0-4 on clay, and 0-1 on grass at ATP level. 26-11 (70.3%) on clay and 2-5 (28.6%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Elmer Moller has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (eight on clay and two on hard). Elmer Moller serves an average of 2.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.6.

Liam Draxl: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Liam Draxl holds a 51-26 record (66.2%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 307 times, winning 205 (66.8%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Liam Draxl has posted a 51-30 record (63.0% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Liam Draxl holds a record of 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 160-71 (69.3%) on hard and 42-23 (64.6%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 38-16 (70.4%) on hard and 9-3 (75.0%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Liam Draxl has won nine titles at Challenger/ITF level (eight on hard and one on clay). Liam Draxl serves an average of 4.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 3.9.