Elmer Moller vs Lorenzo Musetti Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Elmer Moller and Lorenzo Musetti have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Elmer Moller: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Elmer Moller holds a 0-4 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 5 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Elmer Moller has posted a 27-24 record (52.9% win rate). His last match was 3 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Elmer Moller holds a record of 4-7 (36.4%) on clay, 0-1 on hard, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 120-53 (69.4%) on clay and 37-35 (51.4%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 4-5 (44.4%) on clay, 0-1 on hard, and 0-1 on grass at ATP level. 18-10 (64.3%) on clay and 0-2 on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Elmer Moller has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (eight on clay and two on hard). Elmer Moller is currently serving 2.0 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (51 matches), down from a career average of 2.5.

Lorenzo Musetti: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Lorenzo Musetti holds a 7-2 record (77.8%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 181 times, winning 122 (67.4%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Lorenzo Musetti has posted a 33-21 record (61.1% win rate). His last match was 4 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Lorenzo Musetti holds a record of 85-75 (53.1%) on hard, 78-43 (64.5%) on clay, and 18-11 (62.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 27-16 (62.8%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at ATP level. Lorenzo Musetti has won two ATP tour-level titles (one on hard and one on clay). Lorenzo Musetti is currently serving 5.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (54 matches), up from a career average of 3.6.