Elsa Jacquemot vs Lina Gjorcheska Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Elsa Jacquemot and Lina Gjorcheska have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Elsa Jacquemot: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Elsa Jacquemot holds a 25-11 record (69.4%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 317 times, winning 189 (59.6%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 2-8 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Elsa Jacquemot has posted a 32-28 record (53.3% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Elsa Jacquemot holds a record of 9-16 (36.0%) on hard, 5-14 (26.3%) on clay, and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 95-61 (60.9%) on hard, 63-52 (54.8%) on clay, and 5-4 (55.6%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 8-11 (42.1%) on hard, 1-4 (20.0%) on clay, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at WTA level. 4-1 (80.0%) on hard and 4-2 (66.7%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Elsa Jacquemot has won two titles at Challenger/ITF level (both on hard). Elsa Jacquemot is currently serving 4.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (60 matches), up from a career average of 4.0.

Lina Gjorcheska: Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 5 times, winning 1 (20.0%). Lina Gjorcheska has won her last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Lina Gjorcheska has posted a 31-19 record (62.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Lina Gjorcheska holds a record of 1-1 (50.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 360-189 (65.6%) on clay and 80-61 (56.7%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 20-11 (64.5%) on clay and 7-6 (53.8%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Lina Gjorcheska has won 15 titles at Challenger/ITF level (13 on clay and two on hard). Lina Gjorcheska serves an average of 2.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.3.