Emma Navarro vs Sinja Kraus Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Emma Navarro and Sinja Kraus have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Emma Navarro: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Emma Navarro holds a 20-21 record (48.8%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 177 times, winning 94 (53.1%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Emma Navarro has posted a 27-24 record (52.9% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Emma Navarro holds a record of 58-46 (55.8%) on hard, 27-22 (55.1%) on clay, and 21-11 (65.6%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 10-15 (40.0%) on hard, 8-4 (66.7%) on grass, and 6-2 (75.0%) on clay at WTA level. Emma Navarro has won three WTA tour-level titles (two on hard and one on clay). She has also won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on clay and one on hard). Emma Navarro is currently serving 2.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (51 matches), up from a career average of 1.6.

Sinja Kraus: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Sinja Kraus holds a 0-4 record (0.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 50 6 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Sinja Kraus has posted a 55-29 record (65.5% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Sinja Kraus holds a record of 2-6 (25.0%) on clay, 1-8 (11.1%) on hard, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 174-85 (67.2%) on clay, 58-56 (50.9%) on hard, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 1-3 (25.0%) on hard, 1-5 (16.7%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at WTA level. 30-9 (76.9%) on clay, 9-5 (64.3%) on hard, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Sinja Kraus has won 13 titles at Challenger/ITF level (11 on clay and two on hard). Sinja Kraus is currently serving 1.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (84 matches), down from a career average of 1.7.