Fabian Marozsan vs Martin Landaluce Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Fabian Marozsan and Martin Landaluce have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Fabian Marozsan: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Fabian Marozsan holds a 17-22 record (43.6%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 130 times, winning 59 (45.4%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 3-7 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Fabian Marozsan has posted a 22-27 record (44.9% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Fabian Marozsan holds a record of 46-41 (52.9%) on hard, 21-21 (50.0%) on clay, and 4-10 (28.6%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 15-15 (50.0%) on hard, 5-6 (45.5%) on clay, and 2-4 (33.3%) on grass at ATP level. Fabian Marozsan has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on clay and two on hard). Fabian Marozsan serves an average of 4.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 4.1.

Martin Landaluce: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Martin Landaluce holds a 12-12 record (50.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 31 times, winning 14 (45.2%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Martin Landaluce has posted a 45-34 record (57.0% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Martin Landaluce holds a record of 6-4 (60.0%) on hard, 5-10 (33.3%) on clay, and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 56-35 (61.5%) on hard, 37-29 (56.1%) on clay, and 6-3 (66.7%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 5-2 (71.4%) on hard, 5-5 (50.0%) on clay, and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass at ATP level. 18-12 (60.0%) on hard and 4-2 (66.7%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Martin Landaluce has won three titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Martin Landaluce serves an average of 4.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 4.3.