Federico Cina vs Jenson Brooksby Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Federico Cina and Jenson Brooksby have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Federico Cina: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Federico Cina holds a 1-4 record (20.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 12 times, winning 2 (16.7%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 8-2 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Federico Cina has posted a 35-26 record (57.4% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Federico Cina holds a record of 2-6 (25.0%) on clay and 1-2 (33.3%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 46-28 (62.2%) on hard and 30-23 (56.6%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 1-4 (20.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 14-10 (58.3%) on hard and 14-9 (60.9%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Federico Cina has won two titles at Challenger/ITF level (one on hard and one on clay). Federico Cina serves an average of 3.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 3.0.

Jenson Brooksby: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jenson Brooksby holds a 4-4 record (50.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 152 times, winning 100 (65.8%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 1-9 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jenson Brooksby has posted a 18-25 record (41.9% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Jenson Brooksby holds a record of 50-41 (54.9%) on hard, 13-10 (56.5%) on grass, and 8-11 (42.1%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 12-14 (46.2%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on grass, and 0-5 on clay at ATP level. Jenson Brooksby has won one ATP tour-level title on clay. He has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on hard and one on clay). Jenson Brooksby is currently serving 3.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (43 matches), up from a career average of 2.7.