Felix Auger Aliassime vs Ignacio Buse Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Felix Auger Aliassime and Ignacio Buse have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Felix Auger Aliassime: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Felix Auger Aliassime holds a 9-5 record (64.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 231 times, winning 160 (69.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Felix Auger Aliassime has posted a 49-24 record (67.1% win rate). His last match was 6 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Felix Auger Aliassime holds a record of 172-105 (62.1%) on hard, 46-41 (52.9%) on clay, and 28-17 (62.2%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 40-14 (74.1%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on grass, and 3-5 (37.5%) on clay at ATP level. Felix Auger Aliassime has won seven ATP tour-level titles all on hard. Felix Auger Aliassime is currently serving 10.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (73 matches), up from a career average of 8.7.

Ignacio Buse: Against top 10 players in the last 52 weeks, Ignacio Buse holds a 0-1 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 10 1 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Ignacio Buse has posted a 49-28 record (63.6% win rate). His last match was 6 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Ignacio Buse holds a record of 3-3 (50.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 113-63 (64.2%) on clay and 17-12 (58.6%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 3-3 (50.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 34-15 (69.4%) on clay and 4-5 (44.4%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Ignacio Buse has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Ignacio Buse serves an average of 3.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.8.