Flavio Cobolli vs Jack Draper Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Flavio Cobolli and Jack Draper have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Flavio Cobolli: Against top 10 players in the last 52 weeks, Flavio Cobolli holds a 1-7 record (12.5%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 10 17 times, winning 1 (5.9%). Flavio Cobolli has won his last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Flavio Cobolli has posted a 36-28 record (56.2% win rate). His last match was 4 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Flavio Cobolli holds a record of 33-35 (48.5%) on hard, 28-19 (59.6%) on clay, and 9-7 (56.2%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 14-5 (73.7%) on clay, 11-18 (37.9%) on hard, and 6-3 (66.7%) on grass at ATP level. Flavio Cobolli has won two ATP tour-level titles both on clay. He has also won three titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Flavio Cobolli is currently serving 4.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (64 matches), up from a career average of 4.1.

Jack Draper: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Jack Draper holds a 19-6 record (76.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 50 105 times, winning 59 (56.2%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jack Draper has posted a 30-9 record (76.9% win rate). His last match was 4 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Jack Draper holds a record of 66-30 (68.8%) on hard, 20-14 (58.8%) on clay, and 19-9 (67.9%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 14-3 (82.4%) on hard, 12-4 (75.0%) on clay, and 4-2 (66.7%) on grass at ATP level. Jack Draper has won three ATP tour-level titles (two on hard and one on grass). He has also won 12 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Jack Draper serves an average of 8.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 8.1.