Francisco Comesana vs Jannik Sinner Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Francisco Comesana and Jannik Sinner have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Francisco Comesana: Against top 10 players in the last 52 weeks, Francisco Comesana holds a 0-4 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 10 7 times, winning 2 (28.6%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Francisco Comesana has posted a 25-29 record (46.3% win rate). His last match was 2 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Francisco Comesana holds a record of 16-22 (42.1%) on clay, 11-17 (39.3%) on hard, and 2-3 (40.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 9-12 (42.9%) on hard and 5-9 (35.7%) on clay at ATP level. Francisco Comesana has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (nine on clay and one on hard). Francisco Comesana is currently serving 7.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (54 matches), up from a career average of 5.2.

Jannik Sinner: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jannik Sinner holds a 8-0 record (100.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 158 times, winning 122 (77.2%). Jannik Sinner has won his last 7 matches. Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 9-1 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jannik Sinner has posted a 76-6 record (92.7% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Jannik Sinner holds a record of 224-51 (81.5%) on hard, 83-25 (76.9%) on clay, and 36-10 (78.3%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 51-5 (91.1%) on hard, 18-1 (94.7%) on clay, and 7-0 on grass at ATP level. Jannik Sinner has won 29 ATP tour-level titles (22 on hard, four on clay, and three on grass), including five Grand Slam titles (three on hard and two on grass). Jannik Sinner is currently serving 8.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (82 matches), up from a career average of 6.2.