Francisco Comesana vs Martin Landaluce Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Francisco Comesana and Martin Landaluce have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Francisco Comesana: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Francisco Comesana holds a 11-23 record (32.4%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 64 times, winning 21 (32.8%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Francisco Comesana has posted a 25-31 record (44.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Francisco Comesana holds a record of 16-22 (42.1%) on clay, 11-17 (39.3%) on hard, and 2-3 (40.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 9-12 (42.9%) on hard, 7-10 (41.2%) on clay, and 0-2 on grass at ATP level. Francisco Comesana has won 10 titles at Challenger/ITF level (nine on clay and one on hard). Francisco Comesana is currently serving 7.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), up from a career average of 5.2.

Martin Landaluce: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Martin Landaluce holds a 12-13 record (48.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 32 times, winning 14 (43.8%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Martin Landaluce has posted a 45-35 record (56.2% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Martin Landaluce holds a record of 6-4 (60.0%) on hard, 5-10 (33.3%) on clay, and 1-3 (25.0%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 56-35 (61.5%) on hard, 37-29 (56.1%) on clay, and 6-3 (66.7%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 5-2 (71.4%) on hard, 5-5 (50.0%) on clay, and 1-3 (25.0%) on grass at ATP level. 18-12 (60.0%) on hard and 4-2 (66.7%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Martin Landaluce has won three titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Martin Landaluce serves an average of 4.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 4.4.