Gael Monfils vs Ignacio Buse Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Gael Monfils and Ignacio Buse have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Gael Monfils: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Gael Monfils holds a 4-3 record (57.1%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 264 times, winning 197 (74.6%). Gael Monfils has lost his last 5 matches. Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 2-8 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Gael Monfils has posted a 18-15 record (54.5% win rate). His last match was 3 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Gael Monfils holds a record of 376-199 (65.4%) on hard, 134-96 (58.3%) on clay, and 46-36 (56.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 14-9 (60.9%) on hard, 3-3 (50.0%) on clay, and 1-3 (25.0%) on grass at ATP level. Gael Monfils has won 13 ATP tour-level titles (12 on hard and one on clay). Gael Monfils is currently serving 9.9 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (33 matches), up from a career average of 8.3.

Ignacio Buse: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Ignacio Buse holds a 6-3 record (66.7%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 13 times, winning 7 (53.8%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Ignacio Buse has posted a 49-28 record (63.6% win rate). His last match was 6 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Ignacio Buse holds a record of 3-3 (50.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 113-63 (64.2%) on clay and 17-12 (58.6%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 3-3 (50.0%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 34-15 (69.4%) on clay and 4-5 (44.4%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Ignacio Buse has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Ignacio Buse serves an average of 3.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.8.