Hailey Baptiste vs Hanne Vandewinkel Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Hailey Baptiste and Hanne Vandewinkel have met 1 time in professional competition, with Hanne Vandewinkel leading 1-0. Their most recent encounter was in February 2023 at W25 Bath, where Hanne Vandewinkel prevailed on hard court 6-3 3-6 4-10.

Hailey Baptiste: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Hailey Baptiste holds a 16-19 record (45.7%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 119 times, winning 47 (39.5%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Hailey Baptiste has posted a 24-23 record (51.1% win rate). Her last match was 3 weeks ago. Over her career at WTA level, Hailey Baptiste holds a record of 32-42 (43.2%) on hard, 21-18 (53.8%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 14-15 (48.3%) on hard, 7-5 (58.3%) on clay, and 2-1 (66.7%) on grass at WTA level. Hailey Baptiste has won four titles at Challenger/ITF level (two on hard and two on clay). Hailey Baptiste serves an average of 4.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 4.3.

Hanne Vandewinkel: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Hanne Vandewinkel holds a 1-3 record (25.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 50 6 times, winning 1 (16.7%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Hanne Vandewinkel has posted a 52-28 record (65.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Hanne Vandewinkel holds a record of 1-3 (25.0%) on clay and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 105-31 (77.2%) on hard, 97-54 (64.2%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 1-3 (25.0%) on clay and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at WTA level. 29-6 (82.9%) on hard, 13-11 (54.2%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Hanne Vandewinkel has won 13 titles at Challenger/ITF level (11 on hard and two on clay). Hanne Vandewinkel serves an average of 2.5 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.4.