Harriet Dart vs Taylor Townsend Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Harriet Dart and Taylor Townsend have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Harriet Dart: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Harriet Dart holds a 2-6 record (25.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 139 times, winning 44 (31.7%). Harriet Dart has lost her last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 3-7 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Harriet Dart has posted a 37-24 record (60.7% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Harriet Dart holds a record of 23-29 (44.2%) on grass, 21-41 (33.9%) on hard, and 0-8 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 155-90 (63.3%) on hard, 17-19 (47.2%) on grass, and 11-12 (47.8%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 1-5 (16.7%) on grass and 0-1 on hard at WTA level. 31-14 (68.9%) on hard and 0-1 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Harriet Dart has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Harriet Dart serves an average of 2.1 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.0.

Taylor Townsend: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Taylor Townsend holds a 17-2 record (89.5%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 329 times, winning 226 (68.7%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Taylor Townsend has posted a 28-14 record (66.7% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Taylor Townsend holds a record of 52-58 (47.3%) on hard, 14-20 (41.2%) on clay, and 2-6 (25.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 13-7 (65.0%) on hard, 2-3 (40.0%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at WTA level. Taylor Townsend has won 13 titles at Challenger/ITF level (seven on clay and six on hard). Taylor Townsend is currently serving 4.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (42 matches), up from a career average of 3.9.