Himeno Sakatsume vs Rebecca Sramkova Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Himeno Sakatsume and Rebecca Sramkova have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Himeno Sakatsume: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Himeno Sakatsume holds a 1-2 record (33.3%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 8 times, winning 1 (12.5%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 9-1 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Himeno Sakatsume has posted a 47-22 record (68.1% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Himeno Sakatsume holds a record of 3-4 (42.9%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 177-98 (64.4%) on hard, 18-15 (54.5%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 2-1 (66.7%) on hard at WTA level. 37-16 (69.8%) on hard and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Himeno Sakatsume has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Himeno Sakatsume serves an average of 1.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.6.

Rebecca Sramkova: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Rebecca Sramkova holds a 8-8 record (50.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 498 times, winning 298 (59.8%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Rebecca Sramkova has posted a 25-29 record (46.3% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Rebecca Sramkova holds a record of 32-26 (55.2%) on hard, 9-12 (42.9%) on clay, and 5-5 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 13-16 (44.8%) on hard, 5-4 (55.6%) on grass, and 3-5 (37.5%) on clay at WTA level. Rebecca Sramkova has won one WTA tour-level title on hard. She has also won 13 titles at Challenger/ITF level (nine on clay and four on hard). Rebecca Sramkova is currently serving 3.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (54 matches), up from a career average of 3.1.