Himeno Sakatsume vs Yulia Putintseva Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Himeno Sakatsume and Yulia Putintseva have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Himeno Sakatsume: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Himeno Sakatsume holds a 46-20 record (69.7%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 364 times, winning 227 (62.4%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 9-1 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Himeno Sakatsume has posted a 47-22 record (68.1% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Himeno Sakatsume holds a record of 3-4 (42.9%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 177-98 (64.4%) on hard, 18-15 (54.5%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 2-1 (66.7%) on hard at WTA level. 37-16 (69.8%) on hard and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Himeno Sakatsume has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Himeno Sakatsume serves an average of 1.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.6.

Yulia Putintseva: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Yulia Putintseva holds a 17-6 record (73.9%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 339 times, winning 237 (69.9%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Yulia Putintseva has posted a 25-27 record (48.1% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Yulia Putintseva holds a record of 148-163 (47.6%) on hard, 86-62 (58.1%) on clay, and 18-24 (42.9%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 8-16 (33.3%) on hard, 3-5 (37.5%) on clay, and 1-4 (20.0%) on grass at WTA level. Yulia Putintseva has won three WTA tour-level titles (two on clay and one on grass). Yulia Putintseva serves an average of 1.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 1.2.