Holger Rune vs Michael Zheng Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Holger Rune and Michael Zheng have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Holger Rune: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Holger Rune holds a 1-4 record (20.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 196 times, winning 139 (70.9%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Holger Rune has posted a 14-8 record (63.6% win rate). His last match was 8 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Holger Rune holds a record of 100-58 (63.3%) on hard, 54-33 (62.1%) on clay, and 12-9 (57.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 13-6 (68.4%) on hard and 0-1 on grass at ATP level. Holger Rune has won five ATP tour-level titles (three on clay and two on hard). He has also won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (seven on clay and one on hard). Holger Rune is currently serving 7.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (22 matches), up from a career average of 4.7.

Michael Zheng: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Michael Zheng holds a 1-4 record (20.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 5 times, winning 1 (20.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Michael Zheng has posted a 33-14 record (70.2% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Michael Zheng holds a record of 1-3 (25.0%) on hard and 0-1 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 53-24 (68.8%) on hard, 7-8 (46.7%) on clay, and 0-3 on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 1-3 (25.0%) on hard and 0-1 on clay at ATP level. 24-5 (82.8%) on hard, 0-1 on clay, and 0-3 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Michael Zheng has won four titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Michael Zheng serves an average of 5.0 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 4.7.