Holger Rune vs Vilius Gaubas Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Holger Rune and Vilius Gaubas have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Holger Rune: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Holger Rune holds a 3-5 record (37.5%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 196 times, winning 139 (70.9%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Holger Rune has posted a 36-20 record (64.3% win rate). His last match was 2 months ago. Over his career at ATP level, Holger Rune holds a record of 100-58 (63.3%) on hard, 54-33 (62.1%) on clay, and 12-9 (57.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 23-11 (67.6%) on hard, 9-5 (64.3%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass at ATP level. Holger Rune has won five ATP tour-level titles (three on clay and two on hard). He has also won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (seven on clay and one on hard). Holger Rune is currently serving 5.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), up from a career average of 4.7.

Vilius Gaubas: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Vilius Gaubas holds a 0-1 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 1 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Vilius Gaubas has posted a 41-28 record (59.4% win rate). His last match was 8 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Vilius Gaubas holds a record of 2-1 (66.7%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 127-76 (62.6%) on clay and 10-19 (34.5%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 2-1 (66.7%) on clay at ATP level. 28-15 (65.1%) on clay and 3-4 (42.9%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Vilius Gaubas has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Vilius Gaubas serves an average of 2.8 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.6.