Jacob Fearnley vs Jaime Faria Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jacob Fearnley and Jaime Faria have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Jacob Fearnley: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jacob Fearnley holds a 15-7 record (68.2%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 97 times, winning 75 (77.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jacob Fearnley has posted a 31-29 record (51.7% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Jacob Fearnley holds a record of 7-5 (58.3%) on clay, 6-13 (31.6%) on hard, and 4-6 (40.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 7-5 (58.3%) on clay, 5-12 (29.4%) on hard, and 3-4 (42.9%) on grass at ATP level. Jacob Fearnley has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on hard and one on grass). Jacob Fearnley serves an average of 5.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 5.4.

Jaime Faria: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jaime Faria holds a 3-6 record (33.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 100 11 times, winning 3 (27.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jaime Faria has posted a 24-29 record (45.3% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Jaime Faria holds a record of 4-7 (36.4%) on clay, 1-2 (33.3%) on hard, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 80-43 (65.0%) on hard, 47-42 (52.8%) on clay, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 4-5 (44.4%) on clay, 1-2 (33.3%) on hard, and 0-1 on grass at ATP level. 6-6 (50.0%) on hard, 3-6 (33.3%) on clay, and 2-1 (66.7%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Jaime Faria has won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (six on hard and two on clay). Jaime Faria is currently serving 6.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (53 matches), up from a career average of 5.5.