Jakub Mensik vs Lorenzo Sonego Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jakub Mensik and Lorenzo Sonego have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Jakub Mensik: Against top 50 players in the last 52 weeks, Jakub Mensik holds a 15-12 record (55.6%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 50 55 times, winning 28 (50.9%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jakub Mensik has posted a 35-21 record (62.5% win rate). His last match was 5 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Jakub Mensik holds a record of 37-20 (64.9%) on hard, 11-7 (61.1%) on clay, and 6-7 (46.2%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 20-11 (64.5%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on clay, and 4-3 (57.1%) on grass at ATP level. Jakub Mensik has won one ATP tour-level title on hard. He has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard and two on clay). Jakub Mensik is currently serving 13.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), up from a career average of 9.6.

Lorenzo Sonego: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Lorenzo Sonego holds a 1-15 record (6.2%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 75 times, winning 14 (18.7%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Lorenzo Sonego has posted a 25-29 record (46.3% win rate). His last match was 7 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Lorenzo Sonego holds a record of 80-101 (44.2%) on hard, 54-58 (48.2%) on clay, and 26-21 (55.3%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 19-20 (48.7%) on hard, 5-4 (55.6%) on grass, and 1-5 (16.7%) on clay at ATP level. Lorenzo Sonego has won four ATP tour-level titles (two on hard, one on clay, and one on grass). He has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on clay and one on hard). Lorenzo Sonego is currently serving 6.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (54 matches), up from a career average of 5.8.