Jessica Pegula vs Varvara Lepchenko Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jessica Pegula and Varvara Lepchenko have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Jessica Pegula: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jessica Pegula holds a 6-2 record (75.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 354 times, winning 224 (63.3%). Jessica Pegula has won her last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jessica Pegula has posted a 53-19 record (73.6% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Jessica Pegula holds a record of 206-90 (69.6%) on hard, 53-29 (64.6%) on clay, and 25-14 (64.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 36-12 (75.0%) on hard, 9-3 (75.0%) on clay, and 7-2 (77.8%) on grass at WTA level. Jessica Pegula has won 12 WTA tour-level titles (eight on hard, two on clay, and two on grass). Jessica Pegula is currently serving 3.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (72 matches), up from a career average of 2.7.

Varvara Lepchenko: Throughout her career, she has competed against top 10 38 times, winning 6 (15.8%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 3-7 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Varvara Lepchenko has posted a 31-31 record (50.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Varvara Lepchenko holds a record of 94-130 (42.0%) on hard, 49-62 (44.1%) on clay, and 10-24 (29.4%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 230-121 (65.5%) on hard, 102-68 (60.0%) on clay, and 1-3 (25.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 2-1 (66.7%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at WTA level. 13-13 (50.0%) on clay and 12-5 (70.6%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Varvara Lepchenko has won 14 titles at Challenger/ITF level (12 on hard and two on clay). Varvara Lepchenko is currently serving 2.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (62 matches), up from a career average of 2.2.