Jiri Lehecka vs Martin Damm Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Jiri Lehecka and Martin Damm have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Jiri Lehecka: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Jiri Lehecka holds a 12-1 record (92.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 231 times, winning 162 (70.1%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Jiri Lehecka has posted a 40-22 record (64.5% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Jiri Lehecka holds a record of 82-59 (58.2%) on hard, 25-23 (52.1%) on clay, and 12-8 (60.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 24-14 (63.2%) on hard, 7-3 (70.0%) on grass, and 6-4 (60.0%) on clay at ATP level. Jiri Lehecka has won two ATP tour-level titles both on hard. He has also won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on clay and one on hard). Jiri Lehecka is currently serving 8.4 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (62 matches), up from a career average of 5.9.

Martin Damm: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Martin Damm holds a 0-2 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 3 times, winning 1 (33.3%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Martin Damm has posted a 50-28 record (64.1% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Martin Damm holds a record of 7-6 (53.8%) on hard and 1-2 (33.3%) on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 133-79 (62.7%) on hard, 39-42 (48.1%) on clay, and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 5-5 (50.0%) on hard and 1-2 (33.3%) on clay at ATP level. 29-15 (65.9%) on hard, 4-2 (66.7%) on clay, and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Martin Damm has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Martin Damm serves an average of 12.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 12.0.