Julia Avdeeva vs Sinja Kraus Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Julia Avdeeva and Sinja Kraus have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Julia Avdeeva: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Julia Avdeeva holds a 0-1 record (0.0%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 6 times, winning 2 (33.3%). Julia Avdeeva has won her last 3 matches. Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 8-2 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Julia Avdeeva has posted a 37-19 record (66.1% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Julia Avdeeva holds a record of 0-1 on clay. At Challenger/ITF level: 112-71 (61.2%) on clay and 67-51 (56.8%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 17-9 (65.4%) on hard and 16-8 (66.7%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Julia Avdeeva has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (three on hard and one on clay). Julia Avdeeva is currently serving 4.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (56 matches), down from a career average of 5.5.

Sinja Kraus: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Sinja Kraus holds a 47-22 record (68.1%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 437 times, winning 266 (60.9%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Sinja Kraus has posted a 53-28 record (65.4% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Sinja Kraus holds a record of 2-6 (25.0%) on clay and 1-8 (11.1%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 174-85 (67.2%) on clay, 58-56 (50.9%) on hard, and 2-2 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 1-3 (25.0%) on hard and 1-5 (16.7%) on clay at WTA level. 30-9 (76.9%) on clay, 9-5 (64.3%) on hard, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Sinja Kraus has won 13 titles at Challenger/ITF level (11 on clay and two on hard). Sinja Kraus is currently serving 1.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (81 matches), down from a career average of 1.7.