Julia Riera vs Katie Boulter Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Julia Riera and Katie Boulter have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Julia Riera: Against top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Julia Riera holds a 1-6 record (14.3%). Throughout her career, she has competed against top 100 30 times, winning 6 (20.0%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Julia Riera has posted a 37-28 record (56.9% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Julia Riera holds a record of 10-8 (55.6%) on clay, 3-4 (42.9%) on hard, and 0-1 on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 169-99 (63.1%) on clay and 33-24 (57.9%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 2-1 (66.7%) on clay and 1-1 (50.0%) on hard at WTA level. 24-20 (54.5%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Julia Riera has won seven titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on clay). Julia Riera serves an average of 2.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 2.3.

Katie Boulter: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Katie Boulter holds a 8-3 record (72.7%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 390 times, winning 259 (66.4%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Katie Boulter has posted a 26-25 record (51.0% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Katie Boulter holds a record of 56-59 (48.7%) on hard, 36-21 (63.2%) on grass, and 6-11 (35.3%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 13-13 (50.0%) on hard, 4-5 (44.4%) on clay, and 4-3 (57.1%) on grass at WTA level. Katie Boulter has won four WTA tour-level titles (two on hard and two on grass). She has also won eight titles at Challenger/ITF level (five on hard and one on clay). Katie Boulter is currently serving 2.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (51 matches), down from a career average of 3.4.