Katie Swan vs Ye Xin Ma Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Katie Swan and Ye Xin Ma have met 1 time in professional competition, with Katie Swan leading 1-0. Their most recent encounter was in July 2021 at W25 Lisbon, where Katie Swan prevailed on hard court 6-0 6-3.

Katie Swan: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Katie Swan holds a 45-18 record (71.4%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 350 times, winning 228 (65.1%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 8-2 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Katie Swan has posted a 47-20 record (70.1% win rate). Over her career at WTA level, Katie Swan holds a record of 5-5 (50.0%) on hard and 2-13 (13.3%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 178-80 (69.0%) on hard, 10-8 (55.6%) on grass, and 9-15 (37.5%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on hard at WTA level. 39-14 (73.6%) on hard and 3-2 (60.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Katie Swan has won 17 titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Katie Swan serves an average of 3.3 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with her career average of 3.6.

Ye Xin Ma: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Ye Xin Ma holds a 20-13 record (60.6%). Throughout her career, she has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 465 times, winning 257 (55.3%). Over the past 10 matches, she holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Ye Xin Ma has posted a 20-15 record (57.1% win rate). Her last match was 5 months ago. Over her career at WTA level, Ye Xin Ma holds a record of 1-4 (20.0%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 193-158 (55.0%) on hard, 34-29 (54.0%) on clay, and 7-5 (58.3%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on hard at WTA level. 16-10 (61.5%) on hard, 1-2 (33.3%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Ye Xin Ma has won six titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on hard and one on clay). Ye Xin Ma is currently serving 2.7 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (35 matches), up from a career average of 2.0.