Liam Draxl vs Mark Lajal Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Liam Draxl and Mark Lajal have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Liam Draxl: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Liam Draxl holds a 47-25 record (65.3%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 307 times, winning 205 (66.8%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 5-5 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Liam Draxl has posted a 47-29 record (61.8% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Liam Draxl holds a record of 0-1 on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 160-71 (69.3%) on hard and 42-23 (64.6%) on clay. In the last 52 weeks: 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 34-15 (69.4%) on hard and 9-3 (75.0%) on clay at Challenger/ITF level. Liam Draxl has won nine titles at Challenger/ITF level (eight on hard and one on clay). Liam Draxl serves an average of 4.0 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 3.9.

Mark Lajal: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Mark Lajal holds a 42-19 record (68.9%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 278 times, winning 174 (62.6%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 4-6 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Mark Lajal has posted a 46-26 record (63.9% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Mark Lajal holds a record of 1-2 (33.3%) on hard and 1-2 (33.3%) on grass. At Challenger/ITF level: 147-81 (64.5%) on hard, 13-13 (50.0%) on clay, and 3-3 (50.0%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 1-1 (50.0%) on grass and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 30-13 (69.8%) on hard, 6-3 (66.7%) on clay, and 1-1 (50.0%) on grass at Challenger/ITF level. Mark Lajal has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (all on hard). Mark Lajal serves an average of 5.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 5.5.