Lorenzo Musetti vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz Head to Head Tennis Stats and Match Analysis

Lorenzo Musetti and Pablo Llamas Ruiz have not faced each other yet in our recorded match-ups. This head-to-head comparison analyzes their playing styles and recent performance statistics to provide insights into how a potential matchup might unfold.

Lorenzo Musetti: Against opponents ranked outside top 100 players in the last 52 weeks, Lorenzo Musetti holds a 7-2 record (77.8%). Throughout his career, he has competed against opponents ranked outside top 100 181 times, winning 122 (67.4%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 6-4 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Lorenzo Musetti has posted a 33-21 record (61.1% win rate). His last match was 6 weeks ago. Over his career at ATP level, Lorenzo Musetti holds a record of 85-75 (53.1%) on hard, 78-43 (64.5%) on clay, and 18-11 (62.1%) on grass. In the last 52 weeks: 27-16 (62.8%) on hard, 6-4 (60.0%) on clay, and 0-1 on grass at ATP level. Lorenzo Musetti has won two ATP tour-level titles (one on hard and one on clay). Lorenzo Musetti is currently serving 5.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks (54 matches), up from a career average of 3.6.

Pablo Llamas Ruiz: Against top 20 players in the last 52 weeks, Pablo Llamas Ruiz holds a 0-1 record (0.0%). Throughout his career, he has competed against top 20 4 times, winning 0 (0.0%). Over the past 10 matches, he holds a 7-3 record. Over the past 52 weeks, Pablo Llamas Ruiz has posted a 50-24 record (67.6% win rate). Over his career at ATP level, Pablo Llamas Ruiz holds a record of 7-7 (50.0%) on clay and 1-2 (33.3%) on hard. At Challenger/ITF level: 133-69 (65.8%) on clay and 27-28 (49.1%) on hard. In the last 52 weeks: 4-3 (57.1%) on clay and 0-1 on hard at ATP level. 24-9 (72.7%) on clay and 7-6 (53.8%) on hard at Challenger/ITF level. Pablo Llamas Ruiz has won five titles at Challenger/ITF level (four on clay and one on hard). Pablo Llamas Ruiz serves an average of 2.2 aces per match in the last 52 weeks, consistent with his career average of 2.3.